If you don't control your mind, someone else will…

Rabbit Hole

Stop the Insanity! Please Stop Raising Awareness to the Negative

Many people have read various law of attraction books such as The Secret, Excuse Me Your Life is Waiting, Think and Grow Rich and 100s of others. Many people understand that what you think about and place your focus on attracts your future circumstances, good and bad. This concept has been proven with quantum physics.

Therefore, it does not make sense to support causes that raise awareness for illness and poverty. Instead we should raise awareness for health and prosperity. Stop walking, running and biking for illness. Stop marching or singing for poverty. Stop participating for causes you DO NOT want! Stop pouring buckets of ice water over your head. Unless of course you want the illness, poverty, etc.

(If people really understood what the ice bucket challenge was all about they would run very far away from it. Stop watching and stop participating in the ritual! There is a reason why someone jumped off a building and died after doing the ice bucket challenge…and that is all I will say about it for now.)

Celebrities get involves with charities for publicity and perks. Many people just get involved with charities so they can join a club or claim bragging rights to how many miles they walked to help others. They send out pictures, on Facebook and Twitter, of themselves doing good work. Many people have good intentions. I have participated in the past with good intentions. However, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I know better now.

Many celebrities have participated in charity fraud and hoaxes. Many of the dollars you donate go to both wealthy people who sit on the boards and celebrities who get paid salaries or perks for their endorsement.

To really make a difference, walk, march and sing for health, prosperity, peace and love. Send money to family members and friends who are suffering. If you are worried about not getting the tax deductions, then perhaps you should check your intentions.

What you send out to others returns to you like a boomerang. Give to others freely, and your future will improve. Never take any credit or talk about your charitable actions. Once you take credit for a good deed, you negate the positive outcome for yourself. Never talk about your charity work because it breaks the flow of return and good karma. Giving anonymously, when possible, is the best way to go. The more you give, the more you receive. It is the law of cause and effect. Give to your loved ones freely, and you are giving to yourself as well.

Our thoughts cause shifts and collective thoughts create thought forms that manifest in a greater way. This helps explain why we have more charities, and events for awareness, then ever before yet illness and disease are greater than ever. If raising awareness for something bad stopped it, we would be doing a lot better.

Now that you know, stop raising awareness for what you do not want. Stop the insanity!!!! Focus on what you want and expect the positive returns.

Advertisements

The problem with Tattoos, Body Piercing and Plastic Surgery

Toxins from tattoo ink could be absorbed into the body and cause cancer, scientists have revealed.

Experts believe ink nanoparticles could enter the bloodstream and accumulate in the spleen and kidneys, harming the body’s ability to filter impurities.

Studies have found that some ink used in the UK contains known carcinogens and scientists want more regulation of the dyes used by the industry.

Public Health England says that some inks contain substances such as cobalt and mercury.

Scientists want similar regulations on tattoo dyes that have been introduced on the smoking and sunbathing industries.

Desmond Tobin, director of Bradford University’s centre for skin sciences, told The Sunday Times that he was shocked to discover there was no regulation on inks.

He said: ‘We need to do more work, but there is no question that these substances can be toxic.’

About 20 per cent of British adults have a tattoo and last month Public Health England published new guidance on the industry.

It said: ‘Some inks are sold with little or no accompanying product data, and their composition may remain uncertain even at the point of use.’

The report found that red colors have been found to contain mercury, while greens and blues have been found to contain cobalt.

A study by Jorgen Serup, Copenhagen’s university hospital’s professor of dermatology, found carcinogenic chemicals in 13 of 21 commonly used European tattoo inks.

A study by Jorgen Serup, Copenhagen’s university hospital’s professor of dermatology, found carcinogenic chemicals in 13 of 21 commonly used European tattoo inks.

He told paper: ‘Millions of Europeans are now being tattooed with chemical substances of unknown origin.’

Professor Serup wants people to be given written information about the risks of tattoos and wants further research into the potential dangers.

Two years ago the U.S. Food and Drug Administration launched an investigation after research found inks contained potentially dangerous substances including metals and hyrocarbons that are known carcinogens.

One chemical commonly used to make black tattoo ink called benzo(a)pyrene is known to be a potent carcinogen that causes skin cancer in animal tests.

He told paper: ‘Millions of Europeans are now being tattooed with chemical substances of unknown origin.’

Professor Serup wants people to be given written information about the risks of tattoos and wants further research into the potential dangers.

Two years ago the U.S. Food and Drug Administration launched an investigation after research found inks contained potentially dangerous substances including metals and hyrocarbons that are known carcinogens.

One chemical commonly used to make black tattoo ink called benzo(a)pyrene is known to be a potent carcinogen that causes skin cancer in animal tests.

Tattoos also cause major problems to a person’s energy field. The same is true about body piercing and plastic surgery. To learn more, watch the below YouTube video. It also has more information about why men should not wear gold and what happens to men when they cut their hair.

source: Holographic-Disclosure


Electro Magnetic Mitigation

Repost

 

I hope that you are already aware of the fact that the multitude of wireless devices in use today emit harmful radio and electro-magnetic frequencies.  If not, just Google “cell phone dangers” and start reading.  The more sensitive your body and nervous system is, the more you will feel the negative effects of cell phones, wireless routers, cordless phones, “smart” meters, etc in your home.  We all suffer from the transmissions of these devices, whether or not we notice their harmful side-effects.

The purpose of this short article is to inspire you to take action to reduce your exposure to these frequencies by sharing with you what I have done in my own home.

Elimination and Reduction

Technically, I started this process over 15 years ago by getting rid of my microwave oven.  I don’t even think about that any more, it’s just part of life for me now.

My more recent mitigation efforts began with turning off the wireless feature on my router.  This means that ALL computers in the home are connected directly to the router via Ethernet cables.  Any laptop usage is done with the laptop on a table or desk so that it is not directly on a lap, and the wireless on the laptop is disabled, of course.

Next, I removed all cordless phones and replaced them with corded phones.  It’s like the 80s all over again, but with better hair.  Seriously though, going back to land line phones reduced a huge amount of RF pollution in our home.  I know a lot of you reading this probably don’t even have a landline anymore and you rely totally on your cell phone.  I urge you to get a landline again with a corded phone and turn the cell phone OFF when you are at home.  (Yes, totally off…I promise it will be ok.)

I recommend using your cell phone as little as possible.  I have a cell phone that is always off unless I need to make a call while I am away from home.  This is the only usage that it receives.

Also, if you live in a place with a “smart” meter, move.  Seriously.  If that is not an option, look into ways to shield yourself from the (not so) smart meter.

Finally in the elimination process, I got rid of all compact fluorescent light bulbs and replaced them with standard incandescent bulbs.  CFLs produce much more dirty electricity than a standard bulb, they actually wear out faster in normal on and off usage, and pose a variety of health risks.  (LED bulbs are also a good option, as they do not produce much dirty electricity.)

Mitigation

The best thing I have done all year was to invest in “Microsurge Filters” for our home’s electrical outlets.  Yes, I know it’s only mid-February, but this has had a huge impact in our home.  These devices filter out high-frequency EM waves from the electrical wiring in the walls, drastically reducing levels of harmful EMF in a home.  This was a significant expense, but it was worth the cost.

When doing this type of mitigation, the first thing needed is a “Microsurge Meter” that plugs directly into an outlet and gives a reading of the “Graham-Stetzer Units” in the power line.  This is a measure of the magnitude of the voltage surge on the line.  Higher numbers on the meter are bad, lower numbers are good.

A “typical” high reading would be in the 500-600 GS unit range, and with proper filtration, it should be under 50, with 25 being the ideal level.  The readings in my home were 800-1100 depending on location in the house, and it took 25 filters to get readings on all sockets down in the 25-40 range.  My office alone took five filters to mitigate, and the bedroom required four.

Thanks to these filters, we went from a very bad EMF environment to a very clean one.  Now our home in the woods really feels like it is in the woods!  It feels like being in a remote location where there is no electric power at all.

My wife and I both noticed the effect right away, and I can assure you that it was not a placebo.  I honestly didn’t expect to feel a tangible effect at all, but these filters made a huge difference.  The best analogy I can give is that it was kind of like the sense of relief that one feels when a noisy refrigerator stops running, except that it was EMF based, not sound based.

I purchased “Greenwave Filters” along with the Stetzerizer Microsurge Meter.  I talked with the owner of the store before the purchase and he was very helpful in answering my questions as well as resolving a shipping glitch with his supplier after my purchase.  I interacted with him as a normal customer, and I didn’t tell him that I might send a bunch of business his way if I was happy with the products, so I can honestly say that his level of customer care was excellent.  I negotiated a lower price by buying the filters in bulk, and he was very helpful throughout the whole process, but I didn’t receive any special treatment.

The Greenwave filters are a fairly recent design, marketed as being more effective than the Stetzerizer filters, which I tested myself comparing both filters in one plug, and the Greenwave filter gave a slightly lower reading on the Stetzer Meter than the Stetzer filter did.  The GW filters also have a pass-through plug in the bottom of them so that you do not lose a plug to the filter, unlike Stetzer filters.

More Mitigation

I also have a grounding mat for use at my computer desk.  I honestly do not notice a difference from the grounding mat, but I think it is worthwhile since my computer and monitor are generating EMF fields.

That is where my mitigation process stands as of now, although I will also be replacing all dimmer switches in the house with regular switches, as dimmers generate a LOT of dirty electricity, even if the dimmer is set to maximum.  I verified this with my own testing on an outlet controlled by a dimmer switch. 

There are many more mitigation products out there that can be purchased and attached to a cell phone, cordless phone, router, etc.  I cannot speak for the efficacy of any of those products, but even if you do use them I urge you to follow the simple plan laid out in the “Elimination and Reduction” section above so that you are using the least amount of wireless devices possible. 

Feel free to comment below with the names of any mitigation devices that you have found effective.  Please avoid posting a URL, as that will get hung up in moderation until someone can get to it.

Much Love,
Cameron Day
AscensionHelp.com


Are We Being Played Like a Fiddle?

“I am trying to free your mind, but I can only show you the door. You are the one who has to walk through it.” author unknown

“Obama appoints Monsanto lobbyist to lead FDA. No matter how paranoid or conspiracy minded you are, what the government is actually doing is even worse than you imagine.” choice and truth .com

“How can you have a war on terrorism when war itself is terrorism? Behind the deceptive words designed to entice people into supporting violence–words like democracy, freedom, self-defense, national security–there is the reality of enormous wealth in the hands of a few–the top 1%–while billions of people in the world are hungry, sick and homeless.” Howard Zinn

 

 

US in sweetheart deal with JPMorgan over complicity in Madoff Ponzi scheme

      By      Barry Grey             17 December 2013

The Obama administration is preparing once again to shield JPMorgan Chase and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, from criminal prosecution for their illegal activities, this time in connection with the $20 billion Ponzi scheme operated by Bernard Madoff.

Multiple news outlets reported last week—exactly five years after Madoff, the former chairman of the NASDAQ stock exchange, was arrested at his Manhattan penthouse—that JPMorgan is about to reach a settlement with the Justice Department over charges that the bank failed to alert US authorities about its suspicions that Madoff’s investment firm was a fraud.

JPMorgan, the biggest US bank, was Madoff’s primary banker for more than two decades. The bank collected lucrative fees from Madoff’s firm, which moved billions of dollars through its accounts.

At the time of Madoff’s arrest, the World Socialist Web Site wrote: “Madoff’s scam could not have been carried out without the complicity of the highest echelons of the financial elite and the government.” (See: “The Madoff scandal”). The settlement between the government and JPMorgan, expected to be finalized and formally announced before the end of the year, confirms this analysis.

Madoff himself, interviewed from prison by the Financial Times in 2011, said, “JPMorgan doesn’t have a chance in hell of not coming up with a big settlement… There were people at the bank who knew what was going on.”

Despite ample evidence that this was the case, the Justice Department is reportedly offering a deal in which JPMorgan agrees to pay penalties of between $2 billion and $2.5 billion—about 10 percent of its annual profit—while avoiding a criminal indictment or admission of guilt.

The settlement reportedly includes a so-called “deferred prosecution” agreement, in which US prosecutors list all of the bank’s alleged crimes, but stop short of an indictment as long as the bank pays the fines and acknowledges the facts presented in the government’s complaint.

According to the New York Times, the deferred prosecution agreement is expected to accuse JPMorgan of a “programmatic violation” of the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires banks to maintain controls against money laundering and report suspicious activities to the authorities.

The bank filed a suspicious activity report in Britain in 2008, stating that Madoff’s investment returns “appear too good to be true—meaning that it probably is.” But JPMorgan failed to file a similar warning with US authorities or close Madoff’s account.

Yet no one at the bank will be accused of wrongdoing, and the bank itself will not be criminally charged under the agreement being worked out with the Obama administration.

The fact that the bank alerted British authorities to the phony character of Madoff’s operation makes it all the more unlikely that US regulators were unaware of widespread suspicions regarding Madoff’s firm. At least one prominent investor repeatedly complained to the Securities and Exchange Commission that Madoff was operating a Ponzi scheme, but he was essentially ignored.

Deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements, which have become commonplace in federal investigations of the legal transgressions of US corporations and banks, are not the same as plea bargains, in which defendants actually plead guilty to a crime. These legal free passes for corporate crime have proliferated under the Obama administration, in accordance with its policy of not prosecuting major banks or corporations.

Last March, Attorney General Eric Holder spelled out this policy in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Holder said the big banks are so large and powerful that “if we do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy.”

This is an open statement that the financial elite is above the law. Like aristocracies of old, it is not subject to the laws that apply to the lower orders.

Not a single leading banker has been criminally prosecuted, let alone jailed, since the financial crash of 2008, despite multiple congressional and other government investigations that have documented pervasive law-breaking and fraud by Wall Street banks.

In an op-ed piece in the New York Times on Saturday, David M. Uhlmann, a law professor at the University of Michigan, discussed the vast expansion of non-prosecution and deferred prosecution agreements under the Bush and Obama administrations. He pointed out that from 2004 through 2012, the Justice Department entered into 242 such agreements with corporations, as compared to only 26 in the preceding 12 years.

He further noted that from 2010 to 2012, the criminal division of the Justice Department reached twice as many deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements with corporations as there were plea agreements.

These included a settlement with HSBC Bank in 2012, in which the bank acknowledged it was involved in nearly a trillion dollars’ worth of money laundering, much of it from drug trafficking. Another deal was made with Massey Energy in connection with the 2012 Upper Big Branch mine disaster that killed 29 West Virginia coal miners. Massey had concealed over 300 safety violations at the mine from government inspectors.

The impending deal over the Madoff scandal is the latest in a series of settlements by the JPMorgan in relation to fraudulent activities. Just last month, the bank agreed to pay a nominal $13 billion (the actual cash penalty will be substantially less) to settle charges that it defrauded investors by selling toxic mortgage-backed securities in the run-up to the collapse of the housing bubble in 2007 and 2008.

Earlier this year, it paid $4.5 billion to settle charges that it defrauded pension funds and other institutional investors to whom it sold mortgage bonds.

In September, the bank paid $920 million to settle a US probe into its 2012 “London Whale” trading and accounting scandal. The same month, it paid another $390 million in refunds and $80 million in penalties for billing credit card clients for identity theft protection they never received.

Last July, JPMorgan paid $410 million in penalties and repayments to settle charges it manipulated California and Midwest electricity markets.

The bank is also under investigation for its role in the Libor-rigging scandal, in which major international banks manipulated the world’s benchmark interest rate to increase their profits.

Evidence showing that JPMorgan long knew of Madoff’s scam has emerged in a number of legal complaints against the bank. One claim is that the bank knew about the fraud as far back as 1997, when it was alerted to “round-trip transactions” to and from Madoff’s JPMorgan account.

One bank executive acknowledged that Madoff’s “Oz-like signals” were “too difficult to ignore.”

According to one complaint in 2007, almost 18 months before Madoff’s Ponzi scheme was exposed, a senior risk officer at JPMorgan said, “For whatever it’s worth, I am sitting at lunch with Matt Zames, who just told me that there is a well-known cloud over the head of Madoff and that his returns are speculated to be part of a Ponzi scheme.”

Zames is now co-chief operating officer at the bank.


Science Experiment Tests the Effect of Cellphone Radiation

Student Science Experiment Finds Plants won’t Grow near Cell Phone Radiation

Globalresearch.ca

Ninth-graders design science experiment to test the effect of cellphone radiation on plants. The results may surprise you.

Five ninth-grade young women from Denmark recently created a science experiment that is causing a stir in the scientific community.

It started with an observation and a question. The girls noticed that if they slept with their mobile phones near their heads at night, they often had difficulty concentrating at school the next day. They wanted to test the effect of a cellphone’s radiation on humans, but their school, Hjallerup School in Denmark, did not have the equipment to handle such an experiment. So the girls designed an experiment that would test the effect of cellphone radiation on a plant instead.

The students placed six trays filled with Lepidium sativum, a type of garden cress into a room without radiation, and six trays of the seeds into another room next to two routers that according to the girls calculations, emitted about the same type of radiation as an ordinary cellphone.

Over the next 12 days, the girls observed, measured, weighed and photographed their results. Although by the end of the experiment the results were blatantly obvious — the cress seeds placed near the router had not grown. Many of them were completely dead. While the cress seeds planted in the other room, away from the routers, thrived.

The experiment earned the girls top honors in a regional science competition and the interest of scientists around the world.

According to Kim Horsevad, a teacher at Hjallerup Skole in Denmark were the cress experiment took place, a neuroscience professor at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, is interested in repeating the experiment in controlled professional scientific environments.


Pray you do not come back as a chicken, cow or pig…

I kindly urge you to watch this brief 6 minute video which will leave you speechless.

http://myscienceacademy.org/2013/08/19/without-saying-a-word-this-6-minute-short-film-will-make-you-speechless/

and here are a few words of wisdom from authors unknown…

organic

hunches

hypocrisy

greatest test

follwiseman

409173_372191529525625_576559430_n

enslaved

 

Living in an illusion is a choice…

brainwash


Can You Handle the Truth? Can I?

world stage

hand gestures

911

 

10465_372198726191572_1001661272_nvote

945939_395906853851325_998847602_nbekind

1003287_397336110375066_140430039_nAI

change self leo tol

govt

govt1

971521_662679537095548_2137915305_nwater